You are viewing our Low Graphics Website, you might like to try our Graphic Rich Website (requires Flash plugin). You can also read more about our Accessiblity Policy.

You are here: Home / Locality / Dense Cities

Dense Cities

As urban migration increases, efficient, densely populated cities, not distributed options, are the blueprints for more sustainable places to live.

Historian Tristram Hunt commented early on via the Future Agenda programme blog that “we are currently living through one of the great eras of urbanisation with the great megalopolises of China, Africa, India and South America assuming the cultural and economic dominance which Berlin, Rome, Moscow and London used to enjoy in the 19th and 20th centuries.” He sees that “after a decade of unprecedented urbanisation and industrialisation, China’s cities now resemble the nightmare metropolises of mid-19th century Britain. Accounts of the pollution, ill-health, and overcrowding in Nanjing or Chengdu eerily recall the worst excesses of 1840s Manchester or Glasgow.” But at the same time, the same cities will offer the opportunity to meet the challenges of rapid urbanisation as “many of them also provide the seeds for solving our climate crisis. For the world’s developed cities are coming under increasing pressure from their informed, engaged citizenry to mitigate their environmental impact. And they also contain the technical and innovative capacity to address the problem. So, Berlin has managed to cuts its carbon emissions by 15% and Toronto by some 40% over the last fifteen years. In London, Ken Livingstone successfully developed a pioneering climate change strategy which led to a 19% drop in C02 emissions from traffic inside the congestion charge zone.”

Compact and sustainable

In his initial view on the Future of Cities, Ricky Burdett of the LSE suggested that “in order to be versatile and responsive to change the sustainable city will also have to be compact. A city like Mexico City, which goes on for 100 kilometers in one direction and 150 kilometers in another, has hardly any chance of actually becoming sustainable. On the other hand a city like New York or Copenhagen and a city like London which has highs and lows of density, has the potential to become sustainable within the next 30 years.” This idea of dense cities being more efficient and more sustainable than urban sprawls received significant endorsement around the world throughout the programme. From Delhi, Shanghai and Singapore to Brussels, Cairo, London and New York, many agreed that dense cities are the way forward. “Creating more compact urban environments generally will result in more efficient infrastructures: One direct consequence of variation in population density is the associated energy demands: Tighter, more compact cities have far lower energy use per capita than more spread out ones: So, as energy costs continue to escalate and energy security becomes even more of an issue over the next decade, this inherent design relationship will come more to the fore.”

By 2025 nearly 2.5bn Asians will live in cities. This urban growth is being fuelled by new levels of mobility and the migration of diverse populations within and across nations - especially in China and India. These rural-to-urban migrants are pulled by the tantalizing prospects of jobs and opportunity, driven by the harsh realities of rural life. Cities like Mumbai experience over 40 people moving into the city every hour. People are attracted to live in cities by a number of factors - more opportunities, better jobs, better education and better healthcare. However, while a better quality of life is the aspiration, often the reality is very different. Especially in Africa, but also in Asia, unemployed urban populations frequently congregate in squatter camps or slums. Indeed, as they grow, most cities experience an equal growth in slums. Having “two cities in one” is common and in many places attempts to shift the slums to the periphery increases the rich poor gap and in many eyes makes cities less sustainable: Low wage populations in particular need to be near to their work so that they can spend more time earning and less time travelling. As was stated in Mumbai “we need the slums.”

Slum growth

According to the UN, one fifth of all urban housing is temporary structures and a third of the world’s urban population lives in slums. In sub-Saharan Africa over 70% of people live in unplanned areas. “One billion people live in disease spreading slums characterized by inadequate housing, unsafe drinking water and open sewer systems.  This makes the builders of informal housing the largest housing developers in the world and it is they who are creating the cities of tomorrow.” 

As Ricky Burdett highlighted, with the right decisions we can do address the problems; “Take for example Ciuadad Neza in Mexico City where, as hundreds of thousand immigrants arrive each year, an open ended and networked community is succeeding in establishing a lively economy out of literally nothing.” Similarly “New Delhi holds 13-14 million people depending on the time of day. It used to have the highest pollution rates in the world but then overnight all the auto-rickshaws and the buses were made to change from diesel to natural gas.  If you can use natural gas in New Delhi, then why can’t you use it everywhere? Tokyo is the largest city in the world. Its transport system, integrated by overhead and underground rail systems, means that the average commute is around one hour. Compare that to Los Angeles where the average commute is about two hours and at least 80% of the population takes the car to work. In Tokyo, 80% of the population use public transport. There is little doubt that, seen through the lens of efficiency, more densely populated, compact cities such as Hong Kong and Manhattan are inherently more sustainable places to live than the likes of Houston and Mexico City.”

However, some see that while they attract a lot of attention for their efficiency, “high rise cities like Manhattan and Hong Kong are not the best models for every location. Low rise, medium density cities with between 3 and 7 stories can also provide effective and efficient compact urban environments - for example look at Paris which is the third most dense city in the world but has only one high rise building.” Others disagree and see that “Although Paris is a good example of a dense city without high-rise, it also has problems - as “the centre of the city is frozen” all the post war growth has created ghettoization which has resulted in increasing imbalance in social mobility.

No silver bullet

95% of urban growth in the next twenty years will be in the developing world and there especially, dense cities are seen as the way forward: “The future cities of Asia have to be dense rather than sprawls.” But in this people recognise that there is no single global solution, “no silver bullet” for city design: “Asia as a whole cannot have just one strategy. The solutions must be different for different countries.” Likewise; “there is no singular solution to the urbanisation challenges faced by Asian cities. While the end goal - that of a sustainable city - is the same, the roadmap of how to get there has to be customised to the unique challenges of each city/region.”

While the global mega-city is one extreme interpretation of a dense urban environment, others see that groups of midi-cities are in many ways a better solution. “A network of interlinked cities” with efficient transport systems operating between them can create a highly effective urban area without the challenge of scale in one place: Some see that the Netherlands, one of the most densely populated parts of Europe, is fast becoming a network of midi cities. In a Singapore event this view was endorsed again as “new cities must follow a poly-centre model rather than having a single central business district. This will help cities cut down on travelling distances and transport demand.” And by another: “There is no need to focus on building megacities. The more compact the city the more sustainable it is. One possible solution is the creation of a mega-region which will consist of a number of small and mid-sized cities.” This is supported by a view from Saudi Arabia suggesting, while it is easy to get excited about the global cities, local cities may have a greater overall impact especially when connected to the global cities by effective transport networks. Equally “due to the natural relationship between cities and their inhabitants, we should strive towards bringing services closer to the citizens and consequently create a density of services in future cities. Actions such as decentralizing schools or creating more local shops would decrease the need for people to drive, sometimes even long distances where people live outside of the city centre, and consequently reduce the congestion and pollution in cities.”

European decline

It’s not all about urban expansion however, several experts pointed out that we must remember that in some parts of the world cities are not getting larger: “Global urbanisation in theory does not mean bigger cities in practice. In Europe, for example, declining populations in some countries means many of our cities are becoming less dense.” Similarly “while it is easy to talk about new cities, we must remember existing cities and the need to enhance them for the future. Think of the need for high quality regeneration which is evident in many European cities.” And, from Singapore: “Asia’s experience of urbanisation is vastly removed from that of Europe. Europe’s current challenge is that of regeneration. In Asia it is that plus the creation of brand new cities that are economically and ecologically sustainable.”

Quality of life

Within the core idea of a dense city many people highlighted the need for “quality open spaces” and better consideration of people: The comment that “cities should be for people not cars” was widely endorsed. “A primary focus for future cities must be to provide more quality open spaces - spaces that all can enjoy. For example we should free up as much public space for children. Parks are often so popular that they are too densely packed. Why not pedestrianise 50% of our streets as this would help to promote social interaction?” Green space per capita is one view on quality of life and the WHO recommends at least 8m2 per person. In London the average in 20m2, in Shanghai it is 10m2 while in the sprawl of Los Angeles it is less than 7m2. Gary Lawrence of Arup saw that “much of what is generally discussed in relation to measuring urban environments addresses mobility, access, economic security, and so on - the cores of human urban systems. These are not, however, the cores of the human experience that were uncovered during the ‘choice to stay’ discussion. Peoples’ choices to stay are rooted in non-monetary aspiration, fear and nostalgia, all issues difficult to quantify, but no less important for that.” As was highlighted in Singapore; “In the next ten years, people will become even more environmentally conscious. The tide swell that is taking place now, will effect a ten year change. This will reflect in greener, better, safer cities.”

Impact of climate change

Another big concern raised by some about major future cities is that many of them are continuing to be built on the coast where better trade and communication with other countries has been a traditional rationale. With highly probable rises in sea levels from climate change over the next century, there is an emerging issue that most of the coastal cities in the world are not designed to float, or deal with floods. Recent research from the Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research highlights that, “on current projections, the average sea level will rise by 1.4m by the end of the century.” This would not only mean that the likes of Calcutta, Mumbai and Dhaka will be under water, but also, without considerable flood prevention investment, so will London, New York, Tokyo and Shanghai. Or, to put it another way, around 10% of the global population will be displaced. As many of “the cities for the next decade have already been planned” this is worrying for some.

When we plan for the future, Ricky Burdett sees that “Cities of the future have to be organic, flexible and versatile. As society and aspirations alter over time, the city has to adapt to change. Utopian cities have never worked. The people that created Rome, New York and London certainly didn’t think of them as fixed artifacts that wouldn’t change over time. We have to be clever enough as urban designers to design the city like a metabolism, like a body. When it gets older and weaker, you do corrective surgery. Cities need to be versatile; otherwise they fossilize and die. For example, many cities of the last 50 years have been designed around the needs of the car. But as oil costs soar and the city of the future will increasingly need adapt to modes of transportation that are not petrol-dependent.  This will have a significant impact on the shape of the city.” Others agree that future cities clearly also have to be more sustainable, ideally “producing more energy than they need, become net carbon absorbers, collect and process waste within city limits and collect and clean recycled water.” Dense cities offer this potential and so are widely supported as the way to go.

Tags:
imbalanced population growth

External Resources:

Urban Age Project - LSE

WHO Global Age Friendly Cities

Climate Change and the Environment - Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research

UN Habitat

Initial perspective on Future of Cities
Initial views to the global perspective compiled at the start of the project.

Article rating: 5 / 5 (from 7 votes)

Rate this article:    

Download a PDF of this page

Share:
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share on LinkedIn

Comments

Gareth says
“Good article and summary of issues. Sustaining food supplies may be more of an issue than noted here. Climate change, peak oil, phosphorous (http://tinyurl.com/3u3jplp), etc all put pressures on our ability to feed large populations potentially shifting the power relationship (and attractiveness) between country and city living. City populations may need to travel to farms to assist in production dense living as currently imagined, tends not to lend itself to very local production.”
2280 days ago

Toby says
“Really interesting, thanks!”
2405 days ago

Anonymous says
“test”
2426 days ago

Post a comment:

(optional)


 
 

If you're interested, our old site is still online